Jury: Merck Not Responsible in Vioxx Heart Attack Case
3rd Nov 2005, 22:52 GMT
The New Jersey jurists agreed with Merck that job stress and health risks caused a 60-year old postal worker to have a heart attack
Jury: Merck Not Responsible in Vioxx Heart Attack Case related news:
- Jury Finds Merck Not Responsible for Vioxx User's Heart Attack — KeralaNext: US
- Jury: Merck not responsible for Vioxx user's heart attack — azcentral.com | business
- Big Win For Merck In Vioxx Case — Health News: CBSnews.com
- Merck cleared of liability in Vioxx heart attack case — Business
- Jury Favors Merck in Vioxx Lawsuit — NPR Topics: News
- 9:01 am: Jury finds Merck not responsible for Vioxx user's heart attack — Updates from the Santa Fe New Mexican
- N.J. Jury Clears Drugmaker Merck In Vioxx Heart Attack Case — Insurance Journal
- Jury clears Merck in Vioxx user's heart attack — Detnews.com -- business
- New Jersey jury rules in favor of Merck in Vioxx case — Latest news from Boston Business Journal
- Jury absolves Merck in Vioxx case — baltimoresun.com - business
Latest news from VOA News: Health:
- Japan Announces Regional Summit on Clean Water
- Zimbabwe Bemoans Latest Rejection By Global Fund On AIDS Funds
- Study Shows Costs of a Worldwide Pandemic: Staggering
- Study Links Consumption of Red Meat and Breast Cancer
- Long Lifespan Linked to Nine Factors
- Opthamologist Urges Zimbabweans to Take Steps to Preserve Vision
- Long Lifespan Linked to 9 Factors
- Old Malaria Drug Makes New Comeback in Malawi
- Conference Blames Culture, Poverty, War for African Maternal Deaths
- Houston-Based Medical Program Joins UNICEF to Help Children With AIDS