Volume 168, number S6: Integration without Unification: An Argument for Pluralism in the Biological Sciences
16th Nov 2006, 16:10 GMT
In this article, we consider the tension between unification and pluralism in biological theory. We begin with a consideration of historical efforts to establish a unified understanding of evolution in the neo-Darwinian synthesis. The fragmentation of the evolutionary synthesis by molecular evolution suggests the limitations of the general unificationist ideal for biology but not necessarily for integrating explanations. In the second half of this article, we defend a specific variety of pluralism that allows for the integration required for explanations of complex phenomena without unification on a large scale.
Latest news from Am Nat Latest Issue:
- Volume 168, number S6: A Tale of Two Diversifications: Reciprocal Habitat Shifts to Fill Ecological Space along the Pond Permanence Gradient
- Volume 168, number S6: What Hypotheses Are You Willing to Entertain?
- Volume 168, number S6: Exploring Evolutionary Constraints Is a Task for an Integrative Evolutionary Biology
- Volume 168, number S6: The Sorry State of F2 Hybrids: Consequences of Rapid Mitochondrial DNA Evolution in Allopatric Populations
- Volume 168, number S6: Biological Stoichiometry: A Chemical Bridge between Ecosystem Ecology and Evolutionary Biology
- Volume 168, number S6: Directional Changes in Ecological Communities and Social-Ecological Systems: A Framework for Prediction Based on Alaskan Examples
- Volume 168, number 6: Sexual Conflict and the Evolution of Female Preferences for Indicators of Male Quality
- Volume 168, number 6: Comparative Analysis of Worker Reproduction and Policing in Eusocial Hymenoptera Supports Relatedness Theory
- Volume 168, number 6: Deciphering the Effects of Climate on Animal Populations: Diagnostic Analysis Provides New Interpretation of Soay Sheep Dynamics
- Volume 168, number 6: Evidence for a Time-Integrated Species-Area Effect on the Latitudinal Gradient in Tree Diversity