Why Search More than One?
14th Nov 2006, 10:23 GMT
Here is another example of a search I ran today where several search engines failed to give me the answer I needed. In particular, I was looking for a cached copy of a Web page, since the page was unavailable when I tried to view it. Three search engines failed to have any record of the page, but fortunately, that last one I tried had the page indexed and a cached copy available for me to view. The winner? Live Search. The losers? Ask, Yahoo!, and Google.... . . .
Why Search More than One? related news:
- MSN Search Gone, Replaced by Live Search — SES Blog
- MSN Search Not as Dead as I Thought — SES Blog
- [Meta] Blog Search — Google Blogoscoped
- Live Launches out of Beta — SES Blog
- O'Leary on Google Book Search — SES Blog
- Vertical Search Engines in a Healthy Space — Search Engine Optimization, Google Optimization - RSS Feeds
- Video Search Made the Internet Star — Search Engine Watch
- Visual Search Engine for Finding Items by Photo — ResearchBuzz
- New search engine for children — Seattle Post-Intelligencer: Business News
- SearchInform Releases SearchInform 3.1 — EContent RSS Feeds : Research Center: Search Technology
Latest news from SES Blog:
- More Alerts: 2.0 in 1.0 Clothes?
- Site Searching Fixed at Exalead
- HereUAre, Gigablast, 10 Billion, and Spam
- Follow That Page: 100 Free Pages Tracked
- O'Leary on Google Book Search
- Weekend Search Changes
- LinkFromDomain: New Advanced Search Operator at Live
- New Exalead Interface Launches
- MSN Search Not as Dead as I Thought
- Searching with Diacritics and Accents on Google