Web 3.0 Does Not Validate
13th Nov 2006, 15:03 GMT
This weekend much of the geekosphere was buzzing about the "Web 3.0" article in the NY Times, but from where I stand, Web 3.0 does not validate. Apparently, Web 3.0 is the latest re-branding of the Semantic Web, a noble attempt to turn the Web of documents into a Web of data. Don't get me wrong - the goals of the Semantic Web are good ones, and I believe many of those goals will be met in my lifetime. But too much of the Semantic Web relies on data being valid - that is, valid XML, XHTML, RDF, etc. - and too many of us will
Web 3.0 Does Not Validate related news:
- Web X.whatever — John Battelle's Searchblog
- 70 per cent evade fares — The Age News Headlines
- Transport rebels evading fares — The Age News Headlines
- Web 3.0: What will Mike Arrington do now? — ZDNet Blogs
- Transport rebels shun ticket validation — The Age National Headlines
- Connections — Technocrat
- New York Times launches Web 3.0, the "Pedantic Web" — Good Morning Silicon Valley
- Web 2.0, 3.0, X.O should focus on the IT green field — Between the Lines
- How To Build a Web Spider On Linux — Slashdot
- Web 2.huh? — BusinessWeek Online -- Tech Beat
Latest news from TopXML Reblogger XML News:
- I've finally gotten around to restoring the Fibonacci servers on elharo.com described in Processing XML with Java, after last spring's migration from Linux to Mac OS X. This involved rewriting the services in PHP instead of Java.
- Not the Perfect Time Tracking Tool
- Rough Spots in the LINQ to XML Learning Curve
- A Short Dissertation on EDA
- As part of my continuing e-mail Inbox purging, I have now collected and posted all the user-submitted errata for Effective XML.
- WCF (Indigo) ships with .NET 3.0
- WCF Ships, Doug Purdy Dances, and Don Box Sings
- Channel 9 and the Indigettes
- Impact of GPL'd Java on XML
- Pluralsight at TechEd Europe